Translate

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Many boys being labeled Aspergers and high functioning.

  Does this not bother you?? It bothers me. You are telling me someone is "high functional" but has Asperger syndrome. If someone is "high functioning why label them with something. Why is it mostly boys? Furthermore, some put it at the same level of autism which is a serious disorder.

  Why do I think this is happening? Sad to say it is more about boys not being girls and that is now a disability. A man is better at concentrating on something and now this ability they have is a "disability" because we live in a society where women can't ever think that men on a mental level are better then them at anything. And they are jealous of a man's ability to focus on a single task at hand without being distracted which for the roles men have to play this skill is needed. They could be proud of this when used properly and not feel jealous. But they instead chose to be jealous of this and make a man feel that having this skill makes him having a "disability" so we can think we are better then him.

Of course there is no way you are benefiting a son or man by doing this. And saying he is high functional but has a disability is just sadly those that have this constant envy of men wanting to put sons down but not wanting it to hurt them generally because they know that wouldn't be good for them or their son but they want it both ways and no matter how they slice it they are putting their son at a disadvantage and it is sad that this envy politics of men vs. women is used by the government and religious leaders that it is leading to this that is just terrible to put young men and give them these labels and think it doesn't harm them or stigmatize them which it does no matter how you slice it.

 


Someone wanted to think they are biologically the decendents of King David


And if you don't agree with her she gets upset and snitched to Facebook (as I don't know who else would do this)

Thursday, December 27, 2012

Naftalli Bennett. A young aspiring politican. Who is he?

I have only recently heard about Naftalli Bennett. He is a Politician to a party that may became the 3rd largest political party.  Some facebook friend who recently made Aliyah and some relatives who live in Israel have to give the credit for finding some new things out of what is going on.

Some of the things he has said happy to hear about. He is concerned about Union and the cost of living in Israel and those rising costs which it is nice to hear someone that talks about general economic issue and would likely agree with him.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naftali_Bennett





Also it is good he has some ideas. He has said he would to annex Area C which has mostly Jews (85-90%) and some Palestinians into part of Israel proper. Which I'm sure some criticize it but I give him credit for having an idea to do something rather then just the status quo which is the easiest position.

His resume looks great. He made over 100 million selling a company he was the CEO for. Cyota.
From his wikipedia entry. "In 1999, he co-founded "Cyota" – an anti-fraud software company and served as its CEO. The company was sold in 2005 to RSA Security for $145,000,000." He also served an elite IDF unit.

So he has money and says some of the things people want to hear.

Is he too good to be true. Does he have negatives?

Sadly there are some items that make me question his sincerity to gain political power  for whatever reason. Some would like to use this to change certain laws that maybe they are vulnerable.

First and foremost. He does not live in Judea and Samaria. He lives in a very affluent area which ok but the reason he gives his wife is "secular". So basically his wife wouldn't want to live in these area's is what he is saying. Is that true, or is he hiding behind wife's skirt? I have no idea. But for someone who claims to be for these issues why didn't he marry a woman who felt the same way he did. There are plenty of women like that or again is that just a smokescreen which it may very be which he himself doesn't really think highly of the people but for political reason he has to take some stance different then the current politicians. I could be nothing as all of us as people have areas where we wish we made a better decision. But in some cases a mans wife does say something about what issue are and aren't important to them when it really come down to it.

The second issue is he does not have a degree in computer science or in some technological area but has a degree in law. Which does make me wonder what his role was at this company that developed a very good product. Was he just a lawyer to prevent others for stealing the idea or he used his law degree to be able to know how to take the work of someone else and pass it off as his own. I don't know but we don't know what his role was other then being a CEO. Which some CEO's are there for political reasons and not because they are really the ones who have the creativity and are dong the hard work in creating the product. Many American politicians are lawyers and many of them are good at saying one thing but then in power doesn't follow through as this was just to get in power.  In his case he does thing to make his resume look good but on deeper analysis what exactly did he do in this company. Even in the military what successes did he have. Would like to see more substance rather then just flashing that he made a lot of money and he served in an elite IDF position.

Lastly, does he have any position on family and moral issues

That is a big issue for Israels long term stability as with any other society. Being a politician it is an issue that you can't take a position because you will offend certain demographics and that is a problem in Israel as in other societies. He was in a home with no female siblings and you have 25% of women who are at a fairly advanced age and still not married. That is very bad no matter what the overall birth rate is. It is bad and demoralizing to men as well with this situation. Are fathers rights to their own children protected unless their is a legit reason not to and not based on very minor stuff.

If I lived in Israel I guess I might vote for him even though on balance I think there is a lot to be concerned of with this guy if he is truly sincere and certainly a guy didn't become this wealthy by just allowing groups that weren't puling their own weight to just continue in that way. If he made his money just by being the political animal in this tech world he may actually not care about the rights who aren't in a position to be that person and/or for "moral" reasons don't want to pit people against each other for their own personal gain as they find that against the torah and what God says.

So a lot of food for thought here. I certainly don't think this guy is a savior as a 40 year old guy who doesn't even live in the area he has expressed some interesting ideas and I really hope Judea and Sameria just think that because this guy has a lot of money that this is to there advantage.








Wednesday, December 19, 2012

A listing of all who died in the Shooting at Sandy Hook.

http://wor710.com/Victims-Lively-Youngsters-Devoted-Adults/15064336

And an excerpt about each of them in the link above. 20 children (all 6 and 7 years old and a whole class wiped out) and 6 adult women were killed in this horrible mass murder.

CHARLOTTE BACON, 6
DANIEL BARDEN, 7
RACHEL D'AVINO, 29
OLIVIA ENGEL, 6
JOSEPHINE GAY, 7
DAWN HOCHSPRUNG, 47
DYLAN HOCKLEY, 6
MADELEINE HSU, 6
CATHERINE HUBBARD, 6
CHASE KOWALSKI, 7
NANCY LANZA, 52
JESSE LEWIS, 6
ANA MARQUEZ-GREENE, 6
JAMES MATTIOLI, 6
GRACE AUDREY McDONNELL, 7
ANNE MARIE MURPHY, 52
EMILIE PARKER, 6
JACK PINTO, 6
NOAH POZNER, 6
CAROLINE PREVIDI, 6
JESSICA REKOS, 6
AVIELLE RICHMAN, 6
LAUREN GABRIELLE ROUSSEAU, 30
MARY SHERLACH, 56
VICTORIA SOTO, 27
BENJAMIN WHEELER, 6
ALLISON WYATT, 6                         

Photo of Class Murdered by Adam Lanza.

Here is the photo of all these innocent children murdered by Adam Lanza.

In this link. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2249694/Sandy-Hook-shooting-The-tragic-school-picture-graders-gunned-Adam-Lanza.html

Has a picture of all 16 children and the teacher who was murdered.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

Nancy Lanza was a prepper.

    One last post on the horrific murder by Adam Lanza. This about her mother again.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9749217/Connecticut-school-shooting-Adam-Lanzas-mother-was-preparing-for-disaster.html

   This is what was reported.From the article. It also emerged that Mrs Lanza had spoken of her fears less than a week before the attack that she was “losing” her son. “She said it was getting worse. She was having trouble reaching him,” said a friend of Mrs Lanza who did not want to be named.

  From reading she didn't share her son Adam with others which in some respects would be a good thing.   Although her family knew about her extreme ideology and encouraged it and what annoys me is if the world is coming to an end wouldn't it be a good idea to not break up the family by suing for divorce. That is the biggest upheavel here. Breaking up the family unit which is the most basic unit that a healthy society needs.

  And her son took it bad as did the father initially. This home life must have been hell being with a mother with such extremist ideas and not really feeling she should make the world more stable by her own behavior and her family encouraging this. If a boy is troubled removing the father couldn't have helped although the father in the end didn't seem to put up much of a fight but much less checks and balances and who knows what she told her son when a son becomes a replacement for a husband you divorced. This post discusses that he was devastated.

   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9747682/Connecticut-school-shooting-troubled-life-of-Adam-Lanza-a-fiercely-intelligent-killer.html

  So it seems the kid needed a father figure who was at best very meek and gave to a woman whatever she wanted. And he immersed himself in video games and had a mother that believed in the end times and herself was acting in ways that don't show a lot of concern for others just oneself and her family supported her extremist behavior.

  But in end the kid himself seem to want to do as much damage as possible as info is coming out that he did load the weapon for the highest impact and as stated some kids were shot 11 times!!! Horrible what this kid did. And killing children which even a video game doesn't have this kind of situation of killing children like this. The only thing I can thing in his own twisted mind he was preventing other children from having to live the tortured life he did of being labeled as troubled and no one really caring. And stuck with a mother who herself didn't exhibit healthy behavior to allow him any contacts with other adults and only with this crazy ideas that she believed.
   



  

A divorced mother. Should they be allowed to homeschool a teenage boy or gril?

Think that is a fair question. This woman did not need to work and pulled her son out of school and herself was certainly different in her behavior then others. This could not have helped being in an environment day after day during the week with a mother who had few of her own obligations. And a son having no male contacts most of the time or anyone other then her mother who seemed to have problems as well. This is my 4th and last post on this topic for now of this horrible massacre of children and women by a man living at home and pulled from school from what seems a very disturbed mother who had few friends and living alone and didn't have to work who was murdered as well in this.

Victoria Soto Saved her students from the murderer.

She ended up losing her own life but in telling the madman that her students were at the gym their lives were saved. RIP. 

http://bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2012/12/victoria_soto_%E2%80%98she_was_hero%E2%80%99

It is offensive to me to claim that Nancy Lanza suffered alone.

Like she was a victim in that regard. This putting adult women above children (which the kid was a teenager) is a very troubling and barbaric development in our society. She was the one who chose to divorce her husband and take the kid out of school and make sure he had no other relationships.

She is an adult who obviously had problems and got away with it by acting like she was a victim which she wasn't and a society that always sees women this way regardless of the reality that she was the daughter of police and was receiving 250,000 in alimony. For whatever reason it seems she could not let go of her own son and have other people have input on what is good for him.

He didn't develop problems in a vacuum. And to act like this boy did throughout his life just shows how sick we are to blame a child for the sins of parents because a 10 year old boy or 17 year old boy has no resources to fight back.

Mass Murder of children and women by Madman Adam Lanza. .

Who is to blame for this? I was on Facebook and had an interesting discussion with 2 women who posted on one of my posts on facebook.

 The son Adam used the weapons of the mother. Who was a big gun fan.

  In addition she did not let others into her home for over 15 years including those she played dice games and they themselves didn't find that odd. She did go outside to show men who worked in her home the guns she owned. http://www.washingtonpost.com/local/newtown-school-shooters-mother-collected-guns-was-loath-to-let-people-inside-home/2012/12/15/d89c2732-4706-11e2-8061-253bccfc7532_story.html

  She was the daughter of police while her husband (who she divorced) was an accountant.

  She pulled him from school in 10th grade it seems a little after the divorce. http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/adam-lanzas-mom-pulled-school-relative/story?id=17985433


    She collected 250,000 a year in alimony after the divorce although he did have custody on weekends but spent the time it sounds like going on trips and he was devastated according to reports but gave what to her wife and more according to reports.  So she didn't have to work and college also was paid by the ex so she could become more and more delutional in hor own right with no husband and her only contact the son she took out of school. The brother was living away from home in NJ.   http://www.ctpost.com/local/article/Divorce-pulled-Lanza-family-apart-4120810.php

  The father got remarried and it seems in general on an emotional level did not want to set any sort of discipline and let her wife do everything in all areas and got remarried (nothing wrong with) but he should have been concerned about his son being pulled from school and spending all this time with his mother who didn't have to work and her overall strange behavior.

  So my feeling is the biggest cause of this was 1. A woman having many weapons and not being secure 2. Men themsleves believing their role is simply to be an ATM machine and never standing up to their wife and children. 3. A society that feels women are always victims and can never have problems themselves and women, the husband, and other ignored the many odd behaviors of the women that were for a long period of time and should have raised alarm bells. In addition she fought with the school that her son be raised a certain way or blamed the school for her sons problems which may have to do partly with a father not being emotionally involved which is what society to tell men to be. Just ATM machines.

  This son obviously had a lot of rage from his mother basically living a strange life and denying him any social contacts.To which nobody said boo and blamed him. Obviously living in an environment like this caused him many delusions as well and he was quick to kill himself as obviously he saw no purpose in his own life.  This behavior is similar to suicide bombers in many ways who kill innocent people as well as their own life and it is a similar type of environment according to studies in Israel of them having weak fathers which makes them easy to brainwash and hating their own life as a man and seeing no purpose in this world. http://analyticaladam.blogspot.com/2011/04/from-article-by-aryeh-tepper-most.html

That is all I have to say of this horrible murder of 20 children and 6 adult women . Sadly as a society we have to question if a woman acts strange and not blame a child for it. The women who she played dice didn't seem to do much (in addition to the fact that she didn't mention her kids) nor did the men who worked there and saw her show off guns and bring them outside. The irony here is by doing this and blaming a child for disturbed parents the 20 yer old took his anger out on children as he himself was taught to blame children for adult problems by many in the culture who are doing just that. 

  





Tuesday, December 11, 2012

Debbie Schlussel claims Macabees would kill "Liberal" Jews. How would you know?

My comment on Facebook on Debbie Schlussel.  
  
  Can you believe this woman? See the link at the end of this post. This spinster Jewish women who ends up being the helpmate of the male Orthodox Rabbis (instead  of being the helpmate to many of the single Jewish men out there who need a wife in which she claims to care about her people)  suggest that the Macabee's would have killed liberal Jews. This  make me wonder since this was a civil war how do they knew who was who. If they looked a certain way that meant they supported the Hellonzed Jews and should be murdered. I am not sure everyone was in the battlefield.

   Simply voting for Obama and being liberal according to Debbie would have got you killed by the Macabees. This is sick!!! I didn't vote for Obama but he isn't banning Circumcision. Like I said this whole story is not clear and censored and you take God's name in vain but saying God commanded on you something that was never commanded but for this holiday to bring this kind of hate is terrible. ANd Debbie is speaking for these male Rabbis and this is why they don't want women married so they can promote their ideas which in many cases are extremely violent which some of the woman think this will create more equality. This is really to basically believe anyone not part of the Orthodox club should be killed because how do you even know who is 'liberal and who isn't. The answer is you don't but anyone not worshiping the Rabbis would be considered "liberal". http://www.debbieschlussel.com/57061/happy-chanukah-modern-day-jewish-liberals-would-have-fallen-to-maccabee-swords/

Sunday, December 09, 2012

Sorry! No Happy Chanukah.

  Sorry. The holiday was made up to compete with pagan ideas of celebrating winter. Which is where the idea's of Christmas come from. It predates them. Here are a number of major points here.


   #1) The book of Macabee mentions an 8 day celebration but no miracle. This miracle obviously was invented later on.

  #2) The book of Macabee was censored and excluded the bible. Now why would celebrate a group that we don't put their writing as part of our tanach when we have books like the book of Esther. Obviously that in itself raises questions

  #3) This celebration was done at the temple. There is no temple today. So why should we then have this in our home instead. If anything it should be a day to mourn the fact we don't have the temple to do this. Not replace it with these menorah's.

  #4) The Menorah has 4 on each side while the Menorah in the temple had 3 on each side. Even if there was an 8 day celebration which was celebrating Succoth and Shminei Atzeret why is this Menorah different.

   #5) And lastly. This was a civil war in which it was Jews who agreed to go along with Greek pagan practices. Much blood was shed and since we don't really learn about it as it is kept secret I don't even know if they killed innocent people who they suspected were Jews who supported for example banning circumcision. The point is though this couldn't have happened without some Jews being involved and agreeing to what the Greeks were doing here.  Judaism to this day has adopted Greek words to their religion.  The term synagogue is a Greek term. The Greek Church refers to itself as Orthodox.  The Greek leader of the Church was called a "Patriarch" and this idea of a male religious leader being the father of the people may have been imitation of the way Greeks worship. Were they Hellonists for doing that. I don't know. Where was the line drawn. I have no idea and have to think that innocent blood may have been shed by thinking almost anything Greek makes you a Hellonist and we see that to this day terms we use are either outright Greek terms or are similar to the way Greeks practice religion and worship of God.



                                     

Sunday, November 25, 2012

Three links on Jewish voting patterns in Orthodox areas

May not be 100% scientific here but interesting nevertheless.

Overall 69% of Jews voting for Obama vs 76% last year. How they come up at this number again I have no idea. I wonder if anyone counted me a single guy living in an apartment a half a mile away of the area of the group being studied here. I voted for Romney is the lesser of two evils.

Anyway according to this link 90% in some Orthodox areas in NY voted for Romney and also a Russian Jewish area as well. http://frontpagemag.com/2012/dgreenfield/romney-won-%EF%BF%BD-in-orthodox-new-york-districts/

In the other article on Kiryas Joel less voted for Romney.

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/article.php?p=144728



In the 3rd article http://www.jewishjournal.com/rosnersdomain/item/the_story_of_the_0.04_orthodox_vote
 some other communities are discussed and it is more evenly divided but in 2000 most Orthodox voted for the Democrat party so this general idea of Orthodox being Republican in general is not really true is how do you explain 2000. I know you had Lieberman but still? It shows that Orthodox as generally being republican is not really true or maybe only recently has become true for a number of reasons including talk radio which Orthodox may listen to radio more then other groups who watch more then TV and this has influenced them. But this propaganda that "Orthodox" equal "Republican" from this article seems to not be the case and may be a recent change based on some shows on talk radio pushing the more conservative party which I can only say to be fair it has effected me as at one point I wasn't and that is coming from an Modern Orthodox home for whatever that is worth as most of Orthodoxy sadly is just Shabbos and Kosher and on other issues you could almost believe anything sadly.

As I said don't know where they get the numbers from overall and how accurate they are. With all the men bashing I would think some men who is voting are not as expected are not counting and that may skew the result and there may be other factors as well which if you have any feel free to post.

Saturday, November 24, 2012

When does the 7th day of Shabbos begin?

It is an interesting question. At creation it says there was evening and there was morning, So the day beings in the evening.

In Rabbinic and to be fair Karaite Judaism as well they have Shabbos begin at around sunset based on this passage.

I was thinking about it since this Friday had some things to do and this day time of year Shabbos does begin very early.

It did get me thinking though just because the day is shorter in the winter and longer in the summer doesn't mean "evening" starts at a different time. The work day is not different in the summer or winter. In addition  by doing this the week is actually slightly more then six days in the spring and slightly less then six days in the fall since sunset become earlier in the fall and later in the spring. Furthermore, according to the bible after the flood God made the decree that there would be cold and heat, summer and winter, seeding and harvest, day and night shall not cease. (Genesis 8:22). Part of this cycle has to do with the sun and having more daylight in different parts of the year that cause the earth to lose and gain heat.

But should the day start at a different time simply because sunset is at a different time because of the season it is. I don't know. As I said it makes a week slightly less or more then 6 days. The other part of this command is to work 6 days. One day of rest and six days of work. And to make the day a start at a different time because there are only 8 hours of daylight is that correct.

Especially today it doesn't make sense since we don't sleep at a different time either in the summer or winter. And Shabbos ends in the late afternoon in the winter just because due to the season the day is short. It would seem it would make more sense to have it about what time sunset on average is which I guess would be about 6 PM since today we don't change our day based on sunset times and even back then the fact that a day was 16 hours vs. 8 hours sunlight to they sleep the other 16 hours in the winter. I didn't live then so I don't know.

There are some crazy ideas like this Lunar Shabbos that it is the 1st, 8th, 15th, 22nd, and 29th of the moon cycle but then you need extra days  that are also Shabbos. But here too to a slight degree you have less then six days of work in the fall and slightly more in the spring and this is because a day is not 12 hours but morning and evening should still be around the same time regardless of daylight or night is extended due to the time of year. Just some thoughts which is a minor idea but in general not sure why the day should start earlier simply because in the winter you only have 8 hours of sunlight as this whole issue of seasons came after the flood so before then evening may have been 12 hours and day 12 hours all the time.

On Why Rabbis automatically assume a women should spit at a man

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yibbum

This came to my attention from a recent post I made.

http://analyticaladam.blogspot.com/2012/11/god-promises-jacob-his-decedents-would.html

In these cases of Yibum as the Rabbis automatically assumed the man's brothers intentions were only for her looks which is equivalent to incest. Thoughts now are crimes. I mean anyone who thinks men bashing started in the 1960's it is being going on foe a long time but men who use their positions of authority to put down other men. It sounds similar to some of the views of Jesus that certain feelings are equivalent to adultery. I  am sorry. You can't be punished for thoughts but this is what Rabbi Tam is doing here and this is a cop out by the way. He just doesn't care about other men in my opinion and accuses men of sexual sins that they did not commit just because they think a woman is attractive.

This is what Rabbi Tam said via wikipedia. By Talmudic times the practice of levirate marriage was deemed secondary in preference to halizah because of the brother's questionable intentions;[23] indeed, to marry a brother's widow for her beauty was regarded by Abba Saul as equivalent to incest.

But the result of this is the women is suppose to spit in the man's face and tell him that he is basically causing his brothers name to be blotted out since he has no children with at least a fairly close genetic link. Spitting in man's face as the norm isn't a concern to Rabbi Tam. I don't know why.

Look at Leviticus Chapter 25:5. The only part I don't get is it says when men dwell together. This would mean some extended family type family arrangement. If not would it then be ok.

Interestingly also this done in other culture is discouraged partly for "equality" concerns.As this is what wikipedia says on this topic in general which in England the monarchy did use this when needed which you would hope anyone is not something "common". So for them on top it was ok.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levirate_marriage


On 2 versions in the bible of the boundaries of Israel

http://www.biblicalheritage.org/BHR/BHR-43.pdf

Interesting because one women on Facebook who since unfriended me was using these expansive borders mentioned in Genesis but there is another discussion of the boundaries  that is smaller and much closer to the boundaries today. So which is right? Also the first one is so expansive and would include Cairo, Egypt and parts of other countries. And this didn't exist during the time of Joshua or David so what is this in reference to. Just posting at times can be provocative as really in today's time it is not going to be part of Israel the way things are nor should it be.

Certainly this may be one reason our enemies hate us because their land would be taken one day as well. Certainly now this map is not needed. It could only be needed if Jews were truly the dust of the earth that they would need additional land that they had now and for that purpose. That certainly is not the case now. The bible does talk about war for conquest that didn't have the same rules as in Israel proper in which we couldn't keep women and children alive as they could have a negative influence. . But for some of the outer areas that would be ok. But at this point this is irrelevant because Jews are at best population wise in a stagnant pattern at best although certainly the area of Gaza that is a part of Israel proper and in addition this area is provided danger to Jews near their in terms of rocket attacks. We aren't the dust of the earth to any degree at this point either and really people even those that support us don't see us and our ideas as a blessing and at best we have to change to fit their religious beliefs which they believe will happen.

.

God spoke to Jacab yet Jacob kept this to himself.

It is interesting that God spoke to Jacob telling him his offspring would inherit the land and when Jacob arose he set up a pillar over there and poured oil as a sign of thanks.

Yet he didn't tell anyone. He didn't start his own religion based on this but kept this to himself.

 Why? For one thing he had no witnesses and people should not just take him on blind faith and in addition he had his purpose here in setting out at the instruction of Rebecca to work for Laban and this prophecy didn't give him an escape from his basic missions he had here which he worked for Laban and got married.


God promises Jacob his decedents would be like the dust of the earth.

In Genesis (Bereshis) 14:14. He promises the land of Israel to Jacob's children (his name later is changed to Israel) in 14:13 and that they will be like the dust of the earth and will spread West, East, North, and South. Has this happened. Not at the moment. The overall birth rate of Jews is 2.2 in Israel and 1.5 in the US. Those numbers mean that Jacob's decedents are actually decreasing in number and in Israel barely increasing as 2.1 is the rate to remain steady. Had recently saw someone on Facebook a Jewish woman  post the expanded borders of Israel to which at this time we don't need such expansive borders when we are only at best if you include Jews in the Diaspora 15 million.

In addition and something have pointed out have noticed that even with a birth rate of 2.2 the distributions is not centered in the middle. You have 20-25% of women who have zero children with even with a rate of just 2.2 you shouldn't have that many with zero with a normal distribution like a bell curve. That number, 0, may actually be the number with the highest numbers as well which the highest numbers should be around 2 or 3 if this was a normal distribution but you have those on the edges of this average in have 0 or 4 or more. Of course the biggest irony if feminism is creating much more inequality among women. Among men as well it is giving the power to fewer men who are raising children (and sadly fathers are under attack as well) so among men the inequality of men living with their  children and those either without or not living with children is greater.

What is so amazing about this is the Jewish Bible was meant to protect men from not having their name disappear from the earth. In  Yibum where if a man did die without children his wife would marry a brother so that the child will be genetically pretty close with the same mother and a man that is his brother. But all religious groups (both Rabbis and Karaites) repealed this law. How they have the right to do this I don't know as the laws are for all time and who are they to think they have more wisdom then God. In some societies they may have had a problem with it but hate to say it but part of it that these so called religious leaders didn't care much about their own people and only cared about advances themselves.

Which their reasoning is that the intention of another man would be bad. So the Rabbis assume a man is guilty until proven innocent. That really is great.  Just check the wikipedia on this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yibbum Didn't know that the Ketubah the male Rabbis created. No comment.  They trust their wisdom more then God's sadly and as a Jewish man I have to point this out as God gave the torah to men as a nation as the 10 commandments seem to be addressing men who obviously if their wives couldn't be there would tell their wives and not specifically to male Rabbis who had extra communication. No evidence of this.

The point of this by the way is the bible felt this should be done to protect a man from leaving the earth without any trace just in general women should understand their responsibilities towards men which from what I see is not there today sadly and most men don't expect it either from what they see growing up as well. We have sort of lost our way in some ways being influenced by other cultures. Only want to reward men that fit a certain agenda if not too bad. But by doing this they are causing Jewish population to go down and men from having no children and grandchildren to preserve their own name. A society like this can't be respected by others as only those connected can get married.




Friday, November 23, 2012

Koby Mandell Foundation. Father makes $80,000 a year from his sons murder.

Koby Mandell was murdered during the second intafada. He was 13 years old.

His parents created a 501(C) with his name. Charity Navigator gives it one star overall.

Here is the link to this. http://www.charitynavigator.org/index.cfm?bay=search.summary&orgid=10968

 14% of the Expenses of the Charity go to the father who makes $80,000 a year. Not bad.More Americans don't make that kind of salary in a year.

  The motto should be "Don't feel bad your son is murdered. You can use your sons death to start your own 501(C). And we complain about Hamas and other using boys as sacrifices for their own personal gain.

   Much of what the site does is just in very poor taste in my opinion. They make their child a perpetual 13 year old and don't seem to be upset that their son never became an adult as this is the beginning of puberty. They have women retreats for their sons deaths and make it that only mothers mourn for children and not fathers. Which is disgusting. I wouldn't want my death to be used for this purpose. With this kind of gender politics and turning one gender against the other then why would you be upset if your son was murdered if you view men as unfeeling people that wouldn't be angry about their own flesh and bloods death. That is what adult men are which of course the irony here is like it always is with the envy politics of feminism the father and a man who is benefiting from his own son's death.

  Also to have comedy for your sons murder. It is just in very poor taste. Just laugh. You child was murdered. Nothing wrong with humor but just seems in this case inappropriate.

  The only proper response to a child's death like this is for the country to protect children from this happening. Which is not what the Mandell's are doing at all instead benefiting from their sons murder. In my opinion, they are no different then those among our enemies who benefit from their sons death. The only slight different is they are not actively seeking their sons death. At the same time this kind of behavior leads to parents being very very neglectful of their own son that in the back of their mind if their son gets murdered they can start a 501(C) and make a good living off of this.

 It is insulting as well that therapist are trying to make profit from this as well and use it for contributions for themselves. In fact there is nothing "abnormal" of someone having anger and never fully getting over this which they shouldn't. To want someone to get over this is actually also morally reprehensible and viewing your own son's death as no big deal. Any man in the bible viewed an unnatural death as some sign God is not with us for some reason but don't worry just laugh because I can make 80,000 a year from my sons death.

  Finally, here is the wikipedia like about his murder. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Koby_Mandell_and_Yosef_Ishran

Thursday, November 22, 2012

Prayer should be sincere and not just something to just mumble words to God

This whole pryaer thing has no biblical basis. God wanted Jews to appear in Jersualem 3 TIMES A YEAR. Not 3 times a day. I know the Talmud iin Brachut for my Jewish readers it was in place according to the talmud of sacrifices (although there is a morning and afternoon sacrifice which is only 2 sacrifices, not 3 and the 3rd prayer isn't even for a sacrifice commanded by God) but a man was not required to give one every day. At my job today it was funny hearing this Muslim women wanting her husband to pray. They want the men (sadly and Jews have imitated this) to just say MINDLESS PRAYERS with the male religious leader keeping a close eye on them and the women know it doesn't make the man a better person but they want the men spending time with useless activities and use God for this putting down of men which the worst part of this is it mocks God. 

In the bible we see prayer done at times but it was done in a sincere way and also realizing that in asking God for help that they owed God in return. Not just asking God to do for them as if God answers to them. 

Just wanted to wish everyone a happy thanksgiving. 

                                                                              Adam 

Sunday, November 11, 2012

Obamacare to tax medical devices in 2013.

Haven't posted here in a while. Have been on Facebook and lost power due to the Hurricane From October 29th, 2012- November 5th, 2012. A full week without power. Did have heat as use gas heat and some light from neighbors who didn't lose electricity though so it could have been worse. Now been back on for a week and hopefully will have some posts soon some. Have a good week and election day is over and Obama won which wasn't crazy about Romey but a 2nd term of Obama does concern me when he has created a bill like Obamacare that taxes medical devices at 2.3%. Something that is a necessity for those that have a physical handicap so why tax them.

Here is what part of a fox news article on this. From the Article.

 "This 2.3 percent tax on medical device makers will raise the price of (for example) every pacemaker, prosthetic limb, stent, and operating table. Can you remind us, Mr. President, how taxing medical devices will reduce the cost of health care? The tax is particularly destructive because it is levied on gross sales and even targets companies who haven’t turned a profit yet.

These are often small, scrappy companies with less than 20 employees who pioneer the next generation of life-prolonging devices. In addition to raising the cost of health care, this $20 billion tax over the next ten years will not help the country’s jobs outlook, as the industry employs nearly 400,000 Americans. Several companies have already responded to the looming tax by cutting research and development budgets and laying off workers."

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/07/05/five-major-obamacare-taxes-that-will-hit-your-wallet-in-2013/#ixzz2ByZPa8oA

Wednesday, October 24, 2012

Barclay Center build on the homes and businesses ruined.

That is the truth. In addition to that people now in Brooklyn near the site having to deal with traffic and noise that they never had to deal with before. Here is in article some people who were hurt by this stadium built as this area became nice because of the citizens who now were forced to leave both families and small businesses. As well as the irony is this bank is known for corruption as well from the links I read.

If the world is only for the super wealthy and other people have no property rights that is a very evil world.

Here is the link and on this movie the battle for Brooklyn. And how judges called this area blighted which it wasn't just for a big stadium.

http://www.indypendent.org/2012/09/28/activists-respond-barclays-center-opening

Monday, October 22, 2012

NYPD beat a 22-year old Jewish homeless man.




Crazy. The biggest elephant to me was if there was a 2nd male cop this likely would have not escalated because he would have been able to cuff him which is clearly scene when other male cops come.

The other issue was he had a right to sleep there and was woken up.

He did act in a way that made the cops uncomfortable but the guy was 22 and being awoken when he had the right to sleep there and didn't know how to react in a way that mad the cops comfortable.

The cops should have checked his story instead to begin with.

The guy was unarmed.

All this equality and victim stuff is actually is not causing peace and love but more violence towards innocent men as is the case here.and if they would have checked the story and they had a cop that was stronger then this female cop this would not have happened. This female cop then took her batton and hit him when he was done which was all she could do. Hit him with the baton.




John Hagee on John Bachelors show. Women and Relgion.

It is very interesting show. You can download it from this site. http://www.wabcradio.com/sectional.asp?id=33447

This show was aired 10/10/12 the 3rd hour as his 2nd guest and starts at about the 19 minute mark.

John Hagee visited Jerusalem in 1978 and claims then he felt that Christians have to build bridges with Jews. It is interesting hearing what he has to say to John Bachelor. Is it true or not true. Not sure as have read that he was always a Christian Zionist. But he mentions how some Christians did not want him to support Israel and that there was a bomb threat and what he says sounds credible at least on the Jewish side although if you are a Christian maybe you feel otherwise and feel he is just slandering other Christians to puff up himself.



Will admit my biggest issue which please read on as discuss in more more detail is John Hagee himself divorced his first wife and had an affair and married the younger women he had an affair with which isn't very kind to the first wife and the adopted children they had who need a father.


People say we should take help where we could get it and in general I would agree. We don't know what is in a person's heart.

Saturday, October 13, 2012

80% of Jewish Boys in Israel in religious schools Myopic

This according to this link.

http://www.preventmyopia.org/validation.html

Versus only 30% that are in state schools. Interesting article although I think there are numbers of factors (not just reading). Not getting outside enough and getting sunlight, and nutrition also play a role in this which most eye doctors will not tell you. They want you to be near sided. It is more money for them at least some of them.

Here is the quote from the article.

Another study found myopia rates of 80 per cent in 14 to 18-year-old boys studying in schools in Israel that emphasise reading religious texts. The rate for boys in state schools was just 30 per cent.

In other countries as well myopia has reached levels that are  very high and not good for a society to have so many boys myopic.

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Corrupt Male Rabbis promoting throwing the father out of the home in Judea and Sameria.

Being done by Chizuk now,  http://www.chizuknow.com/projects

Also being done by Hebron Fund which I covered in a different post. Will get the link here shortly.

But see the link above.

Their #2 priority is that single women with children have day care so they can work. So government workers now raising the kids which that is a minor issue here.

But where is the father? One of the basic 10 commands in the tablets was to honor your father and mother that you will live in the land. How is this honoring the father??

Also this site talks about following in the footsteps of Abraham and Sarah. In following your haskafa. http://www.chizuknow.com/live-your-hashkafa  How is this following in their footsteps. Sarah wasn't a single mom. She left Israel when God told Abraham to leave the land. She didn't challenge him in this area.

Abraham had idea's against the popular culture of the time. This movement is doing everything to prevent men from disagreeing with any popular notion that may be popular and practiced for a long time but in the end may be false and bad.

This movement is about male Rabbis using the bully pulpit and the government to tell women to divorce their husbands and move to Judea and Sameria and of course these women will likely be good for the Rabbis to push their agenda without any competing men like Abraham who went against the religious ideas of the time.

So this movement is doing everything against what Abraham and Sarah stood for and like others are trashing the memory as much as anybody else we feel is doing the same.

This behavior sadly will cause God to kick us out of these lands as God will not tolerate this immorality. In addition this kind of trying to punish men who think outside the box (for good reasons) will lead to a community that is uncreative and demoralizing to it's own.

In addition the other main focus of this group is to social workers and others who may want to leave .

See the link here. http://www.chizuknow.com/about

Does this sound right to you? Shouldn't they try as normal people develop relationship as neighbors and not snitch to a social worker or have social workers spy on people to see if they are happy or not and if not likely make them feel bad or bribe them. This is just gong to lead to another disaster God forbid with another area that in one way or another God will kick us out which I really hope not or that it is a small group so God will protect based on the mostly good people.

Interesting link on the corrupt family courts.

50% of kids are growing up without their father in the home which this a completely recent development in the US and no society can survive if you destroy the brick of society which is the family. I approve this message but this is terrible and no matter who wins the election Romney or Obama the breakdown of the American family signals a society is steep decline unless this can change which at the moment this issue is not talked about Abortion, Homosexuality but not the issue of children being raised without a father in the home and in many of the cases this is against the fathers will. Seems like an excellent link. In addition the social worker very anti-religious which although 80% of the time it is the father being oppressed if the mother is much more religious then the father and they will persecute the mother instead especially if the father supports various anti-religious causes or even gives a lot of money to feminist causes which never stopped anyone for treating women badly in their own life. Just look at Bill Clinton. Anyway this is an excellent link. 

http://exposingtherecord.org/wchs-social-workers/

And this is what someone wrote back to me on Facebook.

haven't seen my daughter for 3 years due to lies and bull shit in family court. no dads around means kids don't learn many life skills... it won't change.. because the family court doesn't use common sense and unfortunately it is easier to make an allegation and encourage delays just to be malicious.... currently I'm the stay at home dad for my girlfriends two wonderful kids... I ensure that they have a great relationship with their father....but parental alienation and mothers / inlaws from hell... always cause problems in custody forums. 50% time share with children should be granted immediately and parents who prevent fathers from seeing their kids should be sent to jail immediately.

Sunday, September 30, 2012

Starving North Korean women escape to China and then are sold as slaves.

Update: The other issue I was thinking was the one child policy (or two in some cases if the first child is a woman in rural area's as was told by someone from China they allow this exception) but this policy also would lead to more abuses of women since if they had one child and can't have any more much less incentive for the women to be healthy to be able to bear another child and care for more then one child.  Back to my original post.

That is horrible. Socialism and the government controlling the food supply when they nothing about producing food and only want to control the population is causing extreme poverty and China taking advantage of North Korean women who were starving in North Korea and men themselves who can't get a wife due to the female shortage and being poor and having limited skills these men in China, It would be one thing if they treated the women decently but from reading this article mostly they do not which is wrong and evil. http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/topic,4565c22532,459b7d4e2,469dc7b71d9,0,,,PRK.html

As per my update the only thing here that I would question is if a man wants a child the women would have to be in better physical shape or maybe they are so ill from the malnutrition they won't be able to bear a child so they only use the women as a slave basically. The one child policy leads to tremendous evil and more time to control others and clearly reduces the women's own leverage in motherhood and raising children.